The Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 will be a lot better than the Nikon 24-85 - they are in different classes. One is supposed to be a budget lens, and the other is set to compete with Nikon's best. Or are you referring to the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8? If you did mean the Tamron 24-70 f/2.8, then also consider the Nikon 24-120mm f/4 and the Nikon 28-300mm.

Nikon Z7 II Nikon Z 24-70mm F2.8 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Nikon Z 70-200 F2.8 VR Nikon Z 14-24mm F2.8 +5 more Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain

Expert news, reviews and videos of the latest digital cameras, lenses, accessories, and phones. Nikon 24-70 f2.8 VR review Started Dec 2, 2015 | Discussions Forum

Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM – $2,198. Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM – $1,999. Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED – $1,697. Tokina AT-X 24-70mm f/2.8 Pro FX – $937. It’s less than half the cost of each of the three current models, and only a little over half the cost of the previous Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G. Of course, DXOMark scores don’t tell you

Left to right: Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8, 70-200mm f/2.8 VR, 24-70mm f/2.8 . Strobist: SB-800 camera right and behind. SB-800 camera left and behind. SB-800 on floor aimed at wall, gelled red . 2 CTO'd LED flashlights aimed at the 14-24 and 24-70 to bring out the gold lettering (having an extra SB-800 for fill would've been nicer). 4 days ago · Telephoto zooms: Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II – check best price. Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 – check best price. Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport – check best price. Sigma 50-100mm f/1.8 DC HSM | A – check best price. Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport – check best price.
\n nikon 24 70 f2 8 vr review
5.2 x 3.3" (133 x 83mm) long, diameter. 31.7 ounces (900g) weight. included HB-45 lens hood, CL-M3 soft case, caps. US$1890. Model Number 2164. Announced August 2007. Thom's Mini Review: The 24-70mm seems long in the tooth these days. No VR is the usual complaint, but Nikon's more recent zooms—even the more consumer-oriented ones—sometimes Yes, sharper than the 600mm f/4 VR. Almost as sharp as a Zeiss Otus lens. The 300mm f/2.8 makes you go shoot things. It looks cool with its carbon fiber lens hood. It is everything that you’d Photos OK to edit. Aug 12, 2014. #8. Thom Hogan's 70-200 VR II review shows side-by-side image comparisons, and yesthe Nikkor 70-200 VR II loses a TON of effective focal length at minimum focusing distance at 200mm, where the VR II is actually134mm in measured, effective, real, actual focal length. Bottom Line. The Nikon 24 120mm is indeed the cauliflower of lenses. It’s not flashy and it doesn’t have legions of devoted, rowdy fans. While the Nikon 24 120mm isn’t the flagship Nikon 24-70 f/2.8. But it’s a solid lens that provides versatility, quality and performance at a great value. Nikon D810 Nikon D500 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II +20 more Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain

To further enhance its low-light capability, the new NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4 lens also features Nikon's Vibration Reduction (VR) image stabilization technology, which provides up to 4 stops of

Above from left to rigth: Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f2.8E VR on FTZ adapter, Nikon Z 70-200mm f2.8 VR S, Nikon Z 24-200mm f4.0-6.3 VR. Alternatives. Currently the Nikon Z 70-200mm f2.8 VR S is the only 70-200mm lens available in Z-mount. So the alternatives all have to be used via Nikon’s FTZ adapter adding 30.5mm in length and 133g in weight:
hXhOZqk.
  • gx1y30h7bz.pages.dev/89
  • gx1y30h7bz.pages.dev/297
  • gx1y30h7bz.pages.dev/123
  • gx1y30h7bz.pages.dev/222
  • gx1y30h7bz.pages.dev/132
  • gx1y30h7bz.pages.dev/151
  • gx1y30h7bz.pages.dev/30
  • gx1y30h7bz.pages.dev/280

    • nikon 24 70 f2 8 vr review